|
BROADCAST: 26 February
2010 VIOLET GONDA: My guest on the programme Hot Seat is the Mayor of
Harare Much Masunda talking about the issue of service delivery in the capitol
city. Welcome on the programme Mr Masunda. MUCH MASUNDA: Thank you Violet. GONDA: Now let’s start with a general question – the
residents of Harare voted for change and democracy – how have you implemented
these promises? MASUNDA: We have implemented some of them but not all of
them because, I think what needs to be appreciated is that the infrastructure
and other ancillary facilities had become so run down over the years that it
wasn’t going to be an overnight sort of situation to get them working as they
used to. But there are some tangible results that we’ve achieved in the 19
months that we’ve been in office. But I think the starting
point before we go into all these issues that are of concern to the residents
and other stakeholders in Harare is just for your listeners to get an
appreciation of how I got myself into the ‘hot seat’ because that is something
that is not commonly understood. I did not stand for election as a councillor.
What happened was, in the build up towards the harmonised elections that took
place on the 29th of March 2008; amongst the many pieces of legislation that
were amended was the Urban Councils Act. Now the Urban Councils Act was amended
in two significant respects. The first amendment gave the elected councillors,
and in the case of Harare there are 46 of them, because Harare is divided into
46 Wards. Now 45 of the Wards were won by MDC councillors – I’m talking about the
mainstream MDC and the solitary Ward was won by a ZANU PF councillor. So those 46
democratically elected councillors were given an opportunity in terms of this
amendment that I mentioned, to elect a mayor in either of two ways: either they
stick to the hallowed and tried and tested method of choosing a mayor from
amongst their number, in other words choosing one of them to become mayor;
alternatively they were given an option to go to civic society and look for
somebody with sufficiently grey hairs and somebody who is a glutton for
punishment and that’s how I got elected. So we then got sworn into office of
the 1st of July 2008 but it’s not been easy, I will be the first to confess.
But I think we have set about to focus on those critical areas and the very
first one was water and sanitation. GONDA: Mr Mayor, let me interrupt you on that – we will
come to the issue of water and sanitation – but I just want to go back to what
you’ve just told us about how you were appointed. Now correct me if I’m wrong .
. . MASUNDA: Elected – not appointed. GONDA: Is it correct that mayors under the amended Urban
Councils Act are appointed by the Council for one year and that technically
your position is now illegal? MASUNDA: No it’s not correct at all. I mean in the past the
Urban Councils Act made a provision for the mayor to be re-elected on an annual
basis but this amendment that came in, mayors that got elected in the manner
that I did, and together with those that got elected in the old way, they are
in office for five years. So my term will come to an end, in the absence of yet
another harmonised set of elections, I’ll be in office until 2013 and that is
the position. And I checked that out, I mean I’ve been an attorney for many
years, and one thing I would not have overlooked was the basis upon which I’m
in office. So that I think we can square it away, you know there’s no question
of my term having expired. GONDA: And you mentioned that . . . MASUNDA: Can we just finish off the . . . GONDA: Before we go to the issues of service delivery,
just to go back again to a point you raised just now – you said you were chosen
from civic society, but according to court papers filed by disgruntled members
of the Mavambo/Dawn/Kusile group, they name you as a respondent, as a leader in
Simba Makoni’s Mavambo. Are you part of this political party? GONDA: No, I’m not a member of any political party, but
the position as far as Mavambo is concerned is that I as an attorney assisted
in the formation of the Mavambo Trust and I became one of the initial trustees
as it were. You know those are two separate entities altogether. The Mavambo
Trust, you know I am a trustee and that is separate entity altogether from the
Mavambo/Dawn/Kusile Movement. And over the years Violet, you must appreciate
that I’ve studiously and religiously and deliberately avoided getting embroiled
in party politics because it was not going to be of any advantage to me as a
practising attorney. Because as an attorney and as a partner at the time of
Gill, Godlonton & Gerrans which is one of the longest established firms in
Zimbabwe, I could not afford a situation where some of my clients could start
looking at whatever advice I give them in a jaundiced manner because I’m tarred
with one political brush or another. And I have over the years
I have rendered advice to all sorts of people; Simba Makoni has been one of the
recipients of my legal advice, just like I’ve had a fairly close working
relationship over the years with Morgan Tsvangirai and a number of members of
ZANU PF. GONDA: So what does retired Major Mbudzi mean by saying you
are one of those people still in control of some of the assets and resources
belonging to the Party? MASUNDA: The assets that they are squabbling over were
registered in the name of the Trust and the trustees are myself, Abiathar
Mujeyi, Dr Nkosana Moyo and Dr Nkosana Moyo I think resigned following his
appointment as the Chief Operating Officer of the African Development Bank and
he has since been replaced by Pearson Chitando a Chartered Accountant. So we
are there Violet in a fiduciary capacity. The only person amongst the trustees
who is actively involved as a member of Mavambo Mavambo/Dawn/Kusile Movement is
Abiathar Mujeyi. So I can appreciate the difficulty which Kudzai Mbudzi may
have in appreciating the subtleties involved in all this because he is a
military man as opposed to a professional man. GONDA: OK, so let’s go back to the issue of the Harare
City Council and let me start by getting your response to complaints by
residents about the poor performance of elected councillors. Why is that? MASUNDA: Before I go into that Violet, can we complete the
explanation which I’ve started giving about the two significant amendments that
were made to the Urban Councils Act in the build-up towards the harmonised
elections? I’ve explained to you how the democratically elected councillors
were given an option of choosing a mayor. What I’ve not yet explained, is how
the Minister responsible for Local Government, Rural and Urban Development was
given a special dispensation, prerogative in other words to appoint Special
Interest Councillors in all those urban settlements in Zimbabwe and there must
be about, between 15 and 19 of them, in other words cities and towns; and that
dispensation says the Minister has the prerogative to appoint Special Interest
Councillors, not exceeding 25 percent of the democratically elected
councillors. So in the case of Harare
as I said earlier, there are 46 democratically elected councillors, so 25
percent of that in round figures is 11, so we have a compliment of 57
councillors – 46 democratically elected councillors, of whom 45 are MDC, one is
ZANU PF, plus the 11 Special Interest Councillors who were appointed by the
Minister responsible, and in this case Ignatius Morgan Chimhinya Chombo. So by the time we came
into office, the last time that there had been an elected councillor in office
was back in 2004 when Elias Mudzuri was the Executive Mayor of Harare and then
when he was hounded out of office before a series of commissions headed by
amongst others, Sekesai Makwavarara and up until the time that we came into
office, Michael Mahachi. And I think that it was during that period that things
really got out of hand as it were. But the actual battles
that we have as local authority should not be divorced from the social economic
meltdown that occurred in the country as a result of hyper-inflation amongst
other things. And by the time we came to office the unemployment levels had
reached an unprecedentedly high number of 90 percent plus, and people were not
able to pay for the services that they required. So to be more specific,
starting with housing, which is an issue you have raised with me, there has
been no more meaningful housing development for the best part of the last 20 years
and the population of Harare has grown. And as things stand, there’s a
relentless migration of people from rural areas to urban areas and when you
look at for instance, the 58 hostels in Mbare, Matapi Hostel, Matererini and
others, those hostels were built pre-Independence for single migrant workers
and with the advent of Independence in 1980 we did a quick fix and sought to
convert accommodation that was meant for single people into married quarters
and hence the problems that we are having today. And so I think I can tell
you for instance right now that we have initiated, with the assistance and
support of the Ministry of National Housing and Social Amenities, an initiative
that will see a serious development in terms of houses and that development is going
to involve the private sector players like Old Mutual and CABS and as fate
would have it, I’m Chairman of Old Mutual - and CABS is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Old Mutual and so we’re quite serious. We have, as the City
Council, already identified areas where these housing settlements are going to
be built. GONDA: And also, still on the issue of housing, given this
serious backlog on housing which was worsened by Operation Murambatsvina does
the Council have a current housing list? MASUNDA: Yes we have, we have but it’s not really up to
date. GONDA: What is it so far? MASUNDA: I think there’s a backlog of between 500 000 and a
million housing units – which is quite a lot. You know because these things in
a normal environment are dealt with on an incremental basis, but if you have a
situation like I described earlier where there’s been no meaningful housing
settlements built for the best part of the last 20 years, then you’ve got a
problem. GONDA: And is it known or do you know yet how many housing
units you actually own as Council? MASUNDA: Well that’s a very good question actually; all I can
say at this stage is that we have under our jurisdiction 28 housing estates. In
other words suburbs ranging from high density to medium density to low density
and it gets a bit difficult to actually pin point the units that are actually
needed to make up the shortfall, but most of the high density suburbs – that’s
where you find the units that are actually owned by the people of Harare – and
have been rented out to tenants over the years whereas the majority of houses
in the low density areas belong to individual house owners. But you’ll be amazed at
how much property the City of Harare actually owns. You know we have an
exercise that is being undertaken at the moment that is nearing completion to
just give us an indication of who is who and what’s what in the Harare zoo as
it were. And not only in respect of houses and other tangible assets but also
doing a similar exercise to establish the real head count of people employed by
the City of Harare. And that’s something we embarked on immediately after
coming into office in July 2008. We have a compliment at the moment of over 10
500 employees. We are arguably the second largest business in the country and
the second largest employer in the country, second of course in both instances
to government. But I genuinely believe that we could run the City more
effectively from a cost point of view and service delivery point of view with
less that the compliment of 10 500. GONDA: Is it true that some former employees and also some
senior government officials are occupying Council property or Council houses? MASUNDA: Yes it is true, I’ll not deny that and, but you
see, when you look at some of these senior functionaries like the Town Clerk
and the other ten heads of department because we’ve got 11 senior functionaries
ranging from the Town Clerk right down to the recently appointed Director of
Waste Management, as part of their service contract they have over the years
been entitled to occupy a council house. But what happened over the years is
that some of them upon terminating their services with the City for whatever
reason, they then got given the option to buy the houses that they occupy and
others exercised their rights over those properties, others didn’t. But you
also have other situations where certain government officials were not doing
anything remotely connected with the City Council’s business, especially some
of those officials that live outside Harare, they came to be in occupation of
Council houses which were subsequently sold to them in pursuance of a
resolution, Council resolution that was passed some time back to authorise the
sale of the Council houses to sitting tenants. GONDA: Who were some of these government officials? MASUNDA: I can’t name them off hand because they are quite a
number. And there’s a standing court case right now in which the City of Harare
is seeking to evict Joseph Chinotimba from a Council house in Belvedere. GONDA: Is he refusing to leave the house? MASUNDA: Well the law is taking its course and we have
instituted eviction proceedings, yes. In fact there are instances and I believe
Joseph Chinotimba’s case is one of those instances where certain Council
officials were not eligible for accommodation in certain areas, like in this
case, Belvedere where for one reason or another were allowed to take occupation
of these houses and they are now seeking to have those houses sold to them when
in fact they shouldn’t have been there in the first place. All these things are
going to come out in the wash in this exercise that is being undertaken. I can give you umpteen
other examples; you are familiar with Trafalgar Court which overlooks the
Harare Gardens? That is a City of Harare asset. And we’ve got shops on the
ground floor and we’ve got offices up to I believe the third floor and the rest
are residential flats and there are some government employees who are in
occupation of those flats and they occupied those flats in terms of
arrangements that were made way back and I think we need to have a look at all
those cases with a view to rationalise and normalise the situation. GONDA: And what about the victims of Operation
Murambatsvina. What is the Council doing or what has the Council done to
address the plight of the victims? MASUNDA: I will be the first to admit that very little has
been done other than the Garikai/Hlalani Kuhle Project which was spearheaded by
the ministry responsible and we’ve recently been asked to take over that
Project and we are in the throes of doing so. I think your readers will be
aware that Garikai/Hlalani Kuhle Project was hastily put together following the
Murambatsvina scourge and in the course of putting all that together it’s a
classic example of putting the cart before the horse. You know the structures
were put up before the stands were properly serviced, in other words, there was
no provision of water and sanitation facilities. But the structures are there
so we need to move in there and rectify all those things and then get on with
it. GONDA: Is it true that an estimated 200 people actually
faced eviction and thousands of informal traders across Harare also faced being
forcibly removed without being given notice? MASUNDA: That’s a bit of an exaggeration. I think people
need to see things in context. Let’s go back to the situation that pertained
immediately before and immediately after Independence. After Independence we
have seen a whole lot of indiscriminate vending taking place within the City
and there’s been no political will to enforce the by-laws so what my Council is
at pains to do is to clean up the City in a way and have all these vendors
operate from designated points; together with the commuter omnibus operators
and the touts and others that have grown accustomed to doing things with total
impunity. And we are engaging constructively all the key players in the
transport sector for instance with a view to restoring order as it were. GONDA: But some of your critics say that the Council is
implementing policies that are identical to those of the illegal Makwavarara
Commission and that with the latest threats of evictions you were actually
forced to bow down or to bow to pressure after human rights organisations like
Amnesty International put pressure on you to stop the latest evictions. What
can you say about this? MASUNDA: The evictions that attracted the attention of
organisations like Amnesty International were evictions that had more to do not
so much with vending but with accommodation. Because we have squatter camps
starting up here and there especially around the Borrowdale Race Course,
because you’ve got those poor folk who used to be employed by the Mashonaland
Turf Club when the economy was still more buoyant than it is now. And with the
down turn of the economy the fortunes of the Mashonaland Turf Club took a nose
dive and a lot of those poor folk who were employed there as general workers
lost their employment. They were provided historically with accommodation
within the vicinity of Borrowdale Race Course and so those poor guys just spill
over into the commonages that are conveniently near the Borrowdale Race Course
and those are the people that we need to find accommodation for. And I’ve met Amnesty
International Zimbabwe chapter in my office together with the other human
rights organisations that are understandably concerned with the welfare of the
people that we are talking about, and I said right let’s find a win/win
solution as far as we can do with this matter and they undertook to go there.
In fact they’ve brought two representatives from the squatter camp just outside
Borrowdale Race Course and we have a lady who was brought along who was
representing the curio sellers at Newlands shopping centre and we’d like to
have these things done properly. GONDA: But you were going to evict them before you had
actually found alternative accommodation for them. MASUNDA: Well there are no evictions that have taken place
so far. GONDA: But you were threatening to evict them. MASUNDA: Yes we were because we need to take into account
the interests of the other stakeholders whose interests are being prejudiced in
the case of squatter camps that are far too near their residencies. In the case
of vendors, vending that is taking place within the city to the detriment of
the legitimate shop owners who are paying rent and rates and yet they are not
getting much in return. It is a matter that we have to deal with and deal with
appropriately so it’s not just a question of us enforcing the by-laws
willy-nilly. We have to find a sustainable solution to the problem. GONDA: Some say given the economic crisis does it not make
sense to relax building controls and actually allow people to infill stands
with approved structures – and that’s provided such a process does not occur on
utility lines or other problematic areas. Wouldn’t that actually solve the
housing problem or the housing crisis? MASUNDA: Sure, if that would be the answer. But I think one
thing that needs to be borne in mind is that Harare is amongst the most
well-planned cities in sub-Saharan Africa. You have areas that are zoned for
certain types of houses, whether they are low density, high density or medium
density. The moment you start allowing, bending the rules as it were to
accommodate divergent interests then you are going to have a problem. You are
going to create a situation that will lead to the devaluation of properties and
become an untenable situation that one sees in a number of sub-Saharan
countries especially in West Africa, Francophone West Africa. But we have an
overall plan for the development of Harare and that plan was put together
painstakingly by experts on planning issues, and unless that plan is revisited
and changed, we have to stick to it. GONDA: Let me go back to a question I asked earlier on
about the residents’ grievances and one of the grievances was that of the poor
performance of elected councillors; and I asked you why it was like that and
you haven’t really given me an answer to that. So why is it that there’s such
poor performance by elected councillors and also the residents are complaining
that the councillors are not holding meetings with their constituencies. What’s
happening? MASUNDA: Yes, I think those are well-founded grievances
which the ratepayers are making but the truth of the matter is that when these
report back meetings are held, it’s not everybody who is able to attend them,
so I’ve been for instance, since I came into office to a number of high density
areas and have had occasion to address meetings with the councillors for the Wards
and some of those meetings have been very well attended. I recall going to a
meeting in Tafara Community Centre and the Hall was packed to the rafters. But
the tragedy of the whole situation is that things had become so run down that
people expect instant solutions to their problems especially the problems
relating to water and sanitation, refuse removal and electricity and the fact
of the matter as I keep saying, is that the infrastructure had been neglected
for quite a long time to a point where the services that the residents so
richly deserve cannot be provided. GONDA: Is it your view that the Councillors, in your
Council are generally uneducated and are not qualified to be in Council? MASUNDA: I don’t think it’s a question of education as in
possession of formal paper qualifications, it’s a question I think of exposure.
It is true that the majority of them have never, through no fault of their own,
been exposed to the every facet of the community system that is in place within
any local authority and Harare City Council is no exception. But one thing that
the Councillors have, especially the democratically elected councillors is
courage and I take my hat off to them for the raw courage that they have for
having stood up to be counted and lift their heads above the parapet and want
to bring about change that the people of Zimbabwe and in Harare in particular
want and so richly deserve. So it’s a huge learning
curve for a lot of them because they’ve never been exposed to this way of doing
things. And what is not commonly understood by the ratepayers is that
councillors don’t just rock up at a full Council meeting and start waxing
lyrical about any of the issues that may have been drawn to their attention by
the people who voted them into office. We have a committee system that has to
work and work in a certain way. For instance we have got eight standing
committees and most of those committees are fairly technical committees – we’ve
got the Audit Committee, we’ve got the Finance and Development Committee. We’ve
got the Environmental Management Committee, we’ve got the Business Committee,
we’ve got the Procurement Committee, we’ve got the Human Resources and General
Purposes Committee, we’ve got the Information and Publicity Committee and the
eighth committee is arguably the largest because it encompasses health,
education, housing, community services and licensing. And in all those
committees you need people that have some background in the related topic that
has to be dealt with and if you have amongst the councillors anybody who’s not
clued up on any of those issues then of course it’s going to be a problem. But
in an endeavour to plug the gaps that are there we have offered many of the
Councillors capacity building programmes but it’s going to take time for them
to become completely au fait with issues that have to be dealt with. And unfortunately, the
Minister responsible has not come to the party in terms of his choice of some
of the Special Interest Councillors and I’ve been on record having said the Minister
ought to have maybe exercised his prerogative more judicially - because when we
started and having chatted to the 46 democratically elected Councillors it
became apparent that there were certain glaringly absent skills amongst the 46
democratically elected Councillors and those skills could easily have been
plugged by these 11 Special Interest Councillors that the minister responsible
appointed. And those skills that are
glaringly absent have to do with strong accounting skills, strong engineering
skills, strong entrepreneurial skills and strong business skills and
anthropological and sociological skills because to have to deal with the
multifaceted matters affecting a metropolis like Harare you have to have people
that have got the breadth of vision, people that are streetwise, people that
keep their noses and ears to the ground and their eyes wide open. GONDA: In the
final part next week the Harare Mayor tells us, among other issues, why there
is a crippling water crisis even though the Council received money to address
the water problems. He talks about the status of the airport road deal, the
saga behind the purchase of an expensive mayoral vehicle acquired at a time
when the City was failing to deliver a reliable service to ratepayers and he
also explains measures the Council is taking to ease the burden faced by
ratepayers. – ZimOnline |